Showing posts with label Miguel Tejada. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Miguel Tejada. Show all posts

Sunday, March 29, 2009

KIMMEL SPOOFS MIGUEL TEJADA


Since we have some expressed desire for a sports post related to Jimmy Kimmel, here it is.

Back in May, Jimmy Kimmel spoofed Miguel Tejada, who apparently lied about his age, saying he was 31 instead of 33. So in the video found below, Kimmel spoofs this with lying about his weight. Though I'm not the biggest fan of Kimmel, I do have to say that this makes me chuckle.

More information can be found at: http://machochip.com/2008/05/jimmy-kimmel-spoofs-miguel-tej.php



Wednesday, February 27, 2008

Astros need solid pitching to have a chance in 2008

The Houston Astros finished last season 73-89 and are now three years removed from the amazing 2005 run to the World Series. Cecil Cooper, who took over for Phil Garner last year, will be entering his first full season as manager. It should be interesting to see what he does with this team, which did make a little bit of noise in the offseason. They did make a move to bring Miguel Tejada on board, but it came with controversey. Only a few days after the aquisition, Tejada was named in the Mitchell Report. The All-Star shortstop's numbers were down last season and with all the distractions surrounding him, it will be hard to imagine him having a superb year. Carlos Lee and Lance Berkman are the heart of that order and should put up great numbers, especially in that park. Hunter Pence was an impressive rookie last season, but we'll see if he can repeat that success this year. But that's also a disadvantage when it comes to the pitching staff.

They do have Roy Oswalt, who is surely a quality ace, but after that, it's Woody Williams and questionable starters who are still trying to prove themselves in the Big Leagues. Williams is an average pitcher at best and who knows if Wandy Rodriguez will amount to anything. He showed signs last season, but I still need to see more to be convinced. They also signed Shawn Chacon. WooHoo!

I guess I could see Kaz Matsui being a key aquisition, but one good postseason doesn't prove anything. I'm a Mets fan. I don't want Matsui on my team. But if he ends up playing as well as he did with the 2007 Rockies, then the Astros made the right move. For now, we'll see.

Matsui is replacing the long-time Astro Craig Biggio, who retired at the end of last season. The future Hall of Famer will be missed in Houston. He was a gritty player who played the game the right way. Most importantly, he was the heart of the Astro teams of the past. It will be odd watching an Astros game without him in the lineup. I have a lot of respect for Biggio and I'm sure the fans of Houston do as well.

The Astros are looking to get back to the playoffs for the first time since their 2005 run. In my opinion, I can't see it happening this season. They should be better record wise, but not good enough to make the postseason. The Cubs should win the division. They are the most talented team in the Central and I don't see the Astros competing at that level throughout the six month regular season. I think 80 wins sounds about right for this team. A slight improvement from last season, but not to the point to satisfy the Houston faithful.

Shawn Marosek

Thursday, December 13, 2007

Clemens Biggest Fish Caught in Mitchell Report

The long awaited Mitchell Report has been released, and the biggest name by far on the list is Roger Clemens. The news of Clemens using steroids is the biggest bombshell baseball could have had outside ARod if he was on the list.

In my opinion, Roger Clemens using steroids is as big a story as the long assumed use of Barry Bonds. Clemens is one of the top 5, 10 pitchers of all time according to many experts, and even ranked #1 by some. Clemens has won 354 games, seven Cy Youngs, and a rare MVP award for a pitcher. Like Bonds, Clemens played at a very high level into his mid-40s, including a season with a 1.87 ERA at 42 years of age. So, while a big story, the fact Clemens used steroids is hardly shocking.

According to the Mitchell Report, Clemens's steroid use is tied to a first hand witness, Brian McNamee. Mitchell was led to McNamee by Kirk Radomski, whose information helped Mitchell form a big chunk of his report. McNamee was Clemens's trainer from 1998 through May of this year. McNamee says he injected Clemens first hand with steroids during their time in Toronto and then acquired steroids for him through 2001. That is when McNamee claims he stopped acquiring steroids for Clemens, but was unsure if he kept using. There is no paper trail or anything on Clemens, so clearly he did a good job hiding his dealings. So, what it boils down to for Clemens is that McNamee simply turned on him. We probably never would have found out about Clemens unless McNamee decided to talk. Expect Clemens when he talks or releases a comment to call McNamee a liar and ask where anyother proof is.

This is pretty damning evidence though, and it is going to be really hard to Clemens to proof to the court of public opinion that he did not use steroids. Even Barry Bonds's former trainer, Greg Anderson, won't turn on him. Clemens's career actually mirrors Bonds in many ways. He was already a Hall of Famer, but the steroids allowed him to extend his career and have tremendous seasons well into his 40s. I think it's obvious Clemens continued to take steroids after 2001 too. We don't have proof on that, but look at his years in Houston. I know ERAs drop in the NL, but not to 1.78.

The question now is whether or not Roger Clemens will still make the Hall of Fame. I have to give the same answer I give for Bonds. Just because you were a Hall of Famer before you used does not excuse the fact that you cheated the game later in your career. Your actions that significantly hurt the game should weigh more than what you accomplished as a clean player. Look at Pete Rose as an example. His whole career was clearly Hall of Fame level, but he fell out because of actions after he left the game. I think Clemens should be kept out of the Hall of Fame for at least the 15-years he would be eligible on the writers' ballot. Obviously it comes down to the voters, not MLB, to decide, but I hope they feel the same way. I am for forgiveness though as everyone makes mistakes, so if in 20, 30 years and the Veteran's Committee feels he should be in the hall, then I will have no problem with it. I like the idea of baseball veterans ruling on this matter over biased writers.

Other than Clemens and the obvious ones in Bonds and Sheffield, there were only a few notable names. The ones that stood out to me were Andy Pettitte and Miguel Tejada. I expected Tejada to be on the list due to his rapid power decline and ties to the Oakland Athletics. Pettitte would have been surprising if he wasn't Clemens's best friend (and maybe more). It wasn't as big as list as some thought, but it clearly has a epic name to lead it.

Pat Morgan

Wednesday, December 12, 2007

Tejada Traded To Astros For Five Players

The Baltimore Orioles traded All-Star shortstop Miguel Tejada to the Houston Astros Wednesday for five players. Tejada, who has been sort of an Iron man of this generation, leaves Baltimore after a four-year stint with team.

He joins an Astros team who has been down the last few seasons, but maybe adding a talented hitter and fielder like Tejada will provide a boost. Houston gave up a lot of players in the deal. They include outfielder Luke Scott, pitchers Matt Albers, Troy Patten and Dennis Sarfate, and third baseman Michael Costanzo.

This a great pickup for Houston, which is looking to rebound after two disappointing seasons in a row following a World Series appearance in 2005. They have a decent starting staff behing coveted ace Roy Oswalt and have talented youth in Wandy Rodriguez. They did trade Luke Scott, who was a starter a year ago, but the other four names I've never heard of.

I can't see the Astros competing this year for the division unless they start making some serious deals during the offseason. They gave up on Phil Garner as their manager even though he led them to a World Series two years ago for the first time in franchise history! Now they are trying to build this team back up again, and it's not a bad idea to bring Tejada on board.

As for the Orioles, what can I say? The team hasn't been in the postseason since they lost to Cleveland in 1997. They have been near or at the bottom of the standings for over a decade. The team has had to deal with the Raphael Palmeiro steroid problem and now they've traded arguably their best player since Cal Ripken Jr.

Tampa Bay might pass them next season and that's sad. Fortunately for Tejada, he won't have to be a part of it. However, the team he was traded to isn't that great either.

Shawn Marosek